TAM Airport operations, unified.
An airport is run by many parties, each in its own system and its own silo. Total Airport Management puts the operational data, and the real time flow of it, in the hands of the people who run the airport.
Nobody is looking at the whole airport.
An airport is not one organisation. It is an airline, a ground handler, a fueller, a security operation, air traffic control and the operator itself, each running its own systems. The result is a fragmented, reactive operation where the delay is understood after it has happened.
- The airline sees its own flights, and not the stand behind them
- The ground handler sees its own tasks, and not the network pressure
- The fueller, the caterer and the cleaner each work from their own list
- Air traffic control sees the movement, and not the turnaround underneath it
- The people accountable for the whole operation see fragments, after the fact
One platform. Every operation. One record.
When something changes in one place, everyone who depends on it knows immediately. One record, entered once, used everywhere, checked by AI and approved by a human.
One shared operational picture
A coordination layer, not a replacement
A real integration plane
Mobile first, because ramp staff are
AI you can see
Sovereign where policy requires it
Data that flows. Decisions that hold.
At the heart of TAM is one operational record. Every person, flight and asset is stored once and used everywhere, with the source of each fact recorded explicitly. No duplicate entry, no stale information, and no argument about whose number is right.
Part of this is already law, and the deadline is close.
Total Airport Management is not a category we invented. A joint DLR and EUROCONTROL project report set out an initial operational concept and an airport operations centre architecture in 2006, and later European research developed and validated parts of that direction.
Names 28 EU airports directly. A 2026 bilateral adaptation adds two Swiss airports outside that list.
The deadline that has already passed, for initial Airport Operations Plan services.
The deadline ahead, for extended services and for integrating the airport plan with the network plan.
The law mandates the next step. It does not buy the full vision.
We will say this plainly, because you will work it out anyway. Nobody delivers complete Total Airport Management by the end of 2027, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. The 2027 obligation is the customer's forcing function, not our full product deadline. What we can do is help an operator build the governed data, integration, visibility and planning foundation that the next step requires, and do it without locking them into a point solution that goes nowhere afterwards.
Ambition first. Then the honest route to it.
The full ambition is one operating platform across airport operations. This is the order we get there, and what has to be true before each step earns the next one.
Agree the operational data model, the data rights, the security boundary and the co-development scope with a design partner.
Build the canonical operational view: event provenance, identity, explicit source authority, and a narrow set of real inbound connectors.
Add the connector plane and the visibility and planning services that map to Airport Operations Plan and operations centre workflows.
Add controlled actions and operational modules, in a sequence set by customer value and safety risk.
The local airport layer, and where it hands over.
We are not proposing to replace network management. We are proposing the local airport layer that can exchange with it properly.
Operational data, provenance, resources, local weather, constraints and planning
Defined information products and two way exchange over the standard aviation interfaces
The collaborative network plan, flow management and network target times
What we do not claim.
We are looking for two airports, not two customers.
TAM is in MVP. The partner's voice shapes what general availability looks like, which means roadmap influence, partner grade commercials, a named sponsor and a ninety day exploration with a clean go or no go at the end.
A small airport that runs everything in house
A major airport with many providers and many silos
TAM runs on Kaidera.
Everything TAM does with AI inherits the platform underneath it: work classified by impact, high impact actions held for a named human, and a receipt for every action showing what happened, who approved it and why. In an airport, that is not a nice to have. It is the only way the decision survives review.
If you run an airport, we would like to build this with you.
Not a software sale. A ninety day exploration, a named sponsor on both sides, and an honest answer at the end either way.